Guide
What does automatic lead qualification cost? Factors, process, and funding options
There is no reliable flat price for lead qualification — the projects behind them are too different. What actually drives the effort, how you get a concrete quote, and which subsidies are available in Austria.
A flat price for automatic lead qualification cannot be reliably stated — it depends on the scope of the project, not on the provider. Depending on the scope of enrichment and integrations. The actual proposal comes only after a brief, no-obligation initial consultation.
01 — Price
What it costs
- Price
- Individual based on effort
- Typical duration
- 2 to 4 weeks
Depending on the scope of enrichment and integrations. A fixed price can only be quoted seriously after the initial conversation — send us a brief description of your project, and we'll send a proposal that fits the scope and effort.
02 — Factors
What drives the price
- Scope and number of integrations. Every additional system that needs to participate costs effort — regardless of how simple the core is.
- State of your starting point. Clean data, existing content and documented processes significantly reduce effort. Chaos is the most expensive cost factor.
- How much new material needs to be created. What you can contribute doesn't need to be invented by anyone. This is the biggest lever you have in your own hands.
- Requirements for design and customization. A solid standard system costs a fraction of a custom solution — and is sufficient more often than vendors admit.
- Operating model. One-time project costs or ongoing support: calculated over three years, this often gives a different picture than the quote comparison.
03 — Funding
Subsidies in Austria
For digitalization projects, there are several funding programs in Austria, such as KMU.DIGITAL or the aws digitalization funding. Whether and to what extent one of these is currently relevant for your project, we'll review with you individually. Current conditions: kmudigital.at, aws.at.
Which program is relevant, how high the subsidy currently is, and whether the budget for the current funding period is still open changes regularly — plus there are regional funding programs that vary by federal state. Only the information from the funding agencies themselves is reliable, not a fixed percentage stated here.
The most common mistake is always the same: commission first, then want funding. That doesn't work. Allow several weeks of lead time for application and approval.
04 — Scope
What's included
- Inquiry form that asks the right questions without scaring people off
- Automatic enrichment with publicly available company data
- Scoring based on your criteria — region, size, budget, urgency
- Immediate confirmation with realistic response time
- Routing to the responsible person based on topic and region
- Automatic follow-up on inquiries that have been neglected
05 — Questions
Frequently asked questions
Don't more form fields scare people off?
Yes — that's why it's not about more fields, but different ones. Two well-crafted questions bring more clarity than six required fields and cost fewer conversions. Which ones those are, we test on your real inquiries.
Won't we filter out good customers with this?
That's why nothing is automatically rejected, only sorted. Every inquiry remains visible, it's just not on the same pile anymore.
Will we lose inquiries from smaller customers because of this?
No, only the order of processing is sorted, not acceptance. Every inquiry remains visible and answerable — the sorting only decides which one is handled first.
Does this need integration with our CRM?
Useful, but not mandatory. Without CRM integration, scored inquiries land structured in your inbox; with integration, a record with scoring is created directly in the system.
How long does setting up the scoring logic take?
One to two weeks for the criteria and the form, then a test run on your recent inquiries before anything goes live — misclassifications show up right there.
What if our criteria change over time?
The scoring rules are in a table you can adjust yourself without changing any code. A new criterion is one line, not a project.
What's a realistic scoring approach?
Points for hard criteria you can actually verify: region within your service area, scope within your service range, timeframe feasible. Everything else is guesswork and leads to nobody trusting the scoring.
06 — Error
The most common mistakes
- Starting too big. Projects where nobody can use anything for months fail more often than average. A small, usable first step is almost always the better way.
- Not involving the people who work with it. Requirements that only come from management rarely match the actual work.
- Not defining a success measure. Without a metric defined in advance, you can't say afterwards whether it delivered anything — and the next decision will be made on gut feeling again.
- Overlooking operating costs. The project price is only part of it. What operation costs over three years belongs in the same calculation.
- Creating dependency. If you don't get access, documentation and source code, you're locked in. That needs to be clarified before commissioning, not after.
07 — Next
Related pages
- Lead qualification — Overview
- Lead qualification — Economics
- Lead qualification — alternatives
- Lead qualification — status 2026
- Lead qualification — checklist
- Lead qualification — provider comparison
- Lead qualification — risks
- Lead qualification — duration
- CRM integration
- Process automation
- Automate Quote Creation
- All guides
Lead qualification by region
Next step
Let's talk briefly about whether this makes sense for you.
A twenty-minute conversation is usually enough to clarify whether a project makes sense. If not, we'll say so — that's cheaper for both sides than an offer nobody needs.