Guide

Content Creation: Comparing providers — what really matters

Offers for content creation are hard to compare because everyone includes something different. The questions that reveal real differences — and the warning signs.

Quote on requestongoing, typically 2 to 4 posts per monthStatus 2026
In short

When comparing providers for content creation, what matters less is the quoted price than the question of what happens afterward: who maintains the system after it goes live, and what does a later adjustment cost. That's the difference that only shows up after a few months.

01 — Criteria

How quotes differ

  • What exactly is included. Two quotes with the same total can cover completely different deliverables. Ask for scope as a list, not as running text.
  • Who delivers what. Content, images, data, access — if it's not specified, it becomes a point of conflict later.
  • What operation costs. Calculated over three years, including licenses, hosting, and support.
  • What happens if you want to switch. Do you get access, data, and documentation? The answer to this question says more about a provider than any reference.
  • Who actually does the work. With small providers this matters: who sits in the meeting, and who then does it.

02 — Questions

Questions you should ask

  • What happens if the project becomes more expensive than estimated — who bears that?
  • Who owns data, access, and, if developed, the source code?
  • What does operation cost in the second and third year?
  • What does the documentation we receive at the end look like?
  • How would you measure whether the project was successful?
  • Is there a case in which you would advise us against this?

03 — Warning signs

When to be skeptical

  • Guaranteed results. Anyone promising top Google ranking or a specific revenue increase is selling something they can't deliver.
  • No pushback. A provider who thinks every project is a good idea has either not listened or is only selling.
  • Time pressure. Limited-time discounts on project prices are a sales tool, not an offer.
  • Unclear ownership. Anyone who won't clearly say who owns data and access doesn't have your interests at heart.
  • No contact with technical expertise. If only sales sits in the first meeting, that's where misunderstandings arise.

04 — Scope

What's included

  • Topic plan based on real search queries and your sales questions
  • Research and one expert conversation per topic, so there's substance
  • Copy in your language, not in agency-speak
  • Structure for readability and search engines alike
  • Images, graphics and tables where they can replace text
  • Updates to existing posts that are outdated

05 — Questions

Frequently asked questions

What if our specialist knowledge changes quickly?

Then we mark posts with an update date and agree on the rhythm for reviewing them — that's cheaper than rewriting every time.

Who decides what to write about?

Together, based on two sources: what search engine users actually ask, and what your sales team constantly has to explain. Both together produce the topic list.

How long does it take for content to work?

Three to six months for the first positions, longer for competitive topics. Posts on very specific questions often work faster because there's less competition there.

Do we get the texts as raw files too?

Yes, in a common format that you can reuse or adapt yourself. The content belongs to you, regardless of whether we also integrate the page technically.

What about outdated posts?

Update instead of rewriting. A revised post with existing history is almost always more effective than a new one on the same topic.

Do you write that with AI?

We use AI where it helps — structuring research, drafts, variations. The core of every text comes from a professional conversation with you, and every text is revised and checked by a human. Purely machine-generated texts without original knowledge rank poorly and read even worse.

How many posts do we need?

Better two good ones a month than eight thin ones. Search engines now evaluate more clearly by substance; one page that answers a question completely beats five that say the same thing halfway.

Next step

Let's talk briefly about whether this makes sense for you.

A twenty-minute conversation is usually enough to clarify whether a project makes sense. If not, we'll say so — that's cheaper for both sides than an offer nobody needs.